PediatricDigest

PediatricDigest

Wednesday, 2 August 2023

[New post] Earth’s most ancient impact craters are disappearing

Site logo image American Geophysical Union posted: "Earth's oldest craters could give scientists critical information about the structure of the early Earth and the composition of bodies in the solar system as well as help to interpret crater records on other planets. But geologists can't find them, and th" ScienceBlog.com

Earth's most ancient impact craters are disappearing

American Geophysical Union

Aug 2

Earth's oldest craters could give scientists critical information about the structure of the early Earth and the composition of bodies in the solar system as well as help to interpret crater records on other planets. But geologists can't find them, and they might never be able to, according to a new study. The study was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research Planets, AGU's journal for research on the formation and evolution of the planets, moons and objects of our Solar System and beyond.

Geologists have found evidence of impacts, such as ejecta (material flung far away from the impact), melted rocks, and high-pressure minerals from more than 3.5 billion years ago. But the actual craters from so long ago have remained elusive. The planet's oldest known impact structures, which is what scientists call these massive craters, are only about 2 billion years old. We're missing two and a half billion years of mega-craters.

The steady tick of time and the relentless process of erosion are responsible for the gap, according to Matthew S. Huber, a planetary scientist at the University of the Western Cape in South Africa who studies impact structures and led the new study.

"It's almost a fluke that the old structures we do have are preserved at all," Huber said. "There are a lot of questions we'd be able to answer if we had those older craters. But that's the normal story in geology. We have to make a story out of what's available."

Geologists can sometimes spot hidden, buried craters using geophysical tools, such as seismic imaging or gravity mapping. Once they've identified potential impact structures, they can search for physical remnants of the impact process to confirm its existence, such as ejecta and impact minerals.

The big question for Huber and his team was how much of a crater can be swept away by erosion before the last lingering geophysical traces disappear. Geophysicists have suggested that 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) of vertical erosion would erase even the biggest impact structures, but that threshold had never been tested in the field.

To find out, the researchers dug into one of the planet's oldest known impact structures: the Vredefort crater in South Africa. The structure is about 300 kilometers (186 miles) across and was formed about 2 billion years ago when an impactor about 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) across slammed into the planet.

The impactor hit with such energy that the crust and mantle rose up where the impact occurred, leaving a long-term dome. Farther from the center, ridges of rock jutted up, minerals transformed and rock melted. And then time took its course, eroding about 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) down from the surface in two billion years.

Today, all that remains at the surface is a semicircle of low hills southwest of Johannesburg, which marks the center of the structure, and some smaller, telltale signs of impact. The bullseye, caused by the uplift of the mantle, appears in gravity maps, but beyond the center, geophysical evidence of the impact is lacking.

"That pattern is one of the last geophysical signatures that is still detectable, and that only happens for the largest-scale impact structures," Huber said. Because only the deepest layers of the structure remain, the other geophysical traces have disappeared.

But that's okay, because Huber wanted to know just how reliable those deep layers are for recording ancient impacts from both a mineralogical and geophysical perspective.

"Erosion makes these structures disappear from the top down," Huber said. "So we went from the bottom up."

The researchers sampled rock cores across a 22-kilometer (13.7-mile) transect and analyzed their physical properties, searching for differences in density, porosity and mineralogy between impacted and non-impacted rocks. They also modeled the impact event and what its effects on rock and mineral physics would be and compared that to what they saw in their samples.

What they found was not encouraging for the search for Earth's oldest craters. While some impact melt and minerals remained, the rocks in the outer ridges of the Vredefort structure were essentially indistinguishable from the non-impact rocks around them when viewed through a geophysical lens.

"That was not exactly the result we were expecting," Huber said. "The difference, where there was any, was incredibly muted. It took us a while to really make sense of the data. Ten kilometers of erosion and all the geophysical evidence of the impact just disappears, even with the largest craters," confirming what geophysicists had estimated previously.

The researchers caught Vredefort just in time; if much more erosion occurs, the impact structure will be gone. The odds of finding buried impact structures from more than 2 billion years ago are low, Huber said.

"In order to have an Archean impact crater preserved until today, it would have to have experienced really unusual conditions of preservation," Huber said. "But then, Earth is full of unusual conditions. So maybe there's something unexpected somewhere, and so we keep looking."


Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from ScienceBlog.com.
Change your email settings at manage subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://scienceblog.com/539045/earths-most-ancient-impact-craters-are-disappearing/

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app to use Reader anywhere, anytime

Follow your favorite sites, save posts to read later, and get real-time notifications for likes and comments.

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com on Twitter WordPress.com on Facebook WordPress.com on Instagram WordPress.com on YouTube
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at August 02, 2023
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Latest from Food Politics: Official announcement: Sugar Coated

I just got my copy of the University of California Press catalog for Fall 2026. The full catalog does not seem to be online yet (mine is h...

  • PowKids Clean Protein: Raising Powerful Kids!
    Photo courtesy of PowKids! I received samples of Powkids protein ($79.98 valu...
  • Does Lauren Boebert have her GOP primary locked up — or will a lesser-known candidate break out?
    Money. Incumbency. Near-universal name recognition.U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert [cq ...
  • [New post] Please Take the Time to Read or Watch the President’s Most Important Speech!
    ...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

PodiatryDigest
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • May 2026 (7)
  • April 2026 (31)
  • March 2026 (31)
  • February 2026 (29)
  • January 2026 (29)
  • December 2025 (32)
  • November 2025 (29)
  • October 2025 (33)
  • September 2025 (33)
  • August 2025 (36)
  • July 2025 (40)
  • June 2025 (24)
  • May 2025 (17)
  • April 2025 (16)
  • March 2025 (16)
  • February 2025 (11)
  • January 2025 (6)
  • December 2024 (8)
  • November 2024 (8)
  • October 2024 (8)
  • September 2024 (1481)
  • August 2024 (1712)
  • July 2024 (2057)
  • June 2024 (2105)
  • May 2024 (2319)
  • April 2024 (2069)
  • March 2024 (2286)
  • February 2024 (2422)
  • January 2024 (2539)
  • December 2023 (1955)
  • November 2023 (1449)
  • October 2023 (1186)
  • September 2023 (1072)
  • August 2023 (826)
  • July 2023 (771)
  • June 2023 (793)
  • May 2023 (829)
  • April 2023 (707)
  • March 2023 (753)
  • February 2023 (673)
  • January 2023 (752)
  • December 2022 (706)
  • November 2022 (731)
  • October 2022 (701)
  • September 2022 (694)
  • August 2022 (716)
  • July 2022 (752)
  • June 2022 (845)
  • May 2022 (1011)
  • April 2022 (1138)
  • March 2022 (596)
  • February 2022 (423)
  • January 2022 (449)
  • December 2021 (581)
  • November 2021 (1495)
  • October 2021 (1539)
  • September 2021 (1455)
  • August 2021 (196)
Powered by Blogger.