After a mystery nosey neighbour claimed that the homeowner's semi-detached property had been painted the wrong colour, the homeowner prevailed in his struggle with the local council.
Chris Elston wanted to give the tatty-looking house a facelift and opted for an off-white paint job with a subtle yellow tinge, which, according to neighbours, is hardly noticeable.
However, because of the cul-de-sac's location in a conservation district in Norwich, Norfolk, council officials determined that it was "detrimental" to the street's appearance and that its colour would need to be restored to its previous state.
Following the issuance of a "repaint" order, Mr Elston found himself in a heated dispute with heritage chiefs over the refurbishment of the £350,000 home.
The homeowner asserted that the report on his property 'exaggerates' the modifications he had made and was misleading and, at times, wrong'.
However, the repaint order was overruled by the council's planning committee in an unusual move, allowing the rental house to maintain its updated appearance.
Mr Elston told a newspaper outlet, 'Our thanks go to the City Council planning committee for supporting us in voting for our application and against the planners.
'By adding external insulation when replacing the render, we have upgraded a home, making it more energy efficient and environmentally friendly.'
The fact that Norwich City Council had initially taken action against the house startled the locals.
Next-door neighbour Jack Betts said: 'I can't see what all the fuss is about - the place was a real eyesore. The paint was old and just looked dirty.
'The owner put up insulation boards because without insulation and just one wall with no cavity, these places can be very cold.'
The plumbing and heating engineer Mr. Betts, 31, continued, saying, "He repainted and rerendered the exterior, and the property now looks very smart."
'I don't know why the council is complaining - it's a real improvement, the house looks smart and is costing a lot less to keep it warm.
'There are several types of houses in the road and it certainly doesn't stand out or look odd.'
Neighbour Giovanni Ablett, 75, who lives opposite, said: 'I don't have any problem with the colour at all. I think the house looks brilliant. It's cleaned up well and the new colour is inoffensive and doesn't stand out.
This was just a petty neighbour with nothing better to do.
I think that when bungalows or houses have the same appearance, it detracts from their uniqueness.
In addition, were there legal fees associated with this dispute with the council planning? How much time and money did the planning department waste, and who approved this kind of spending?
This photo shows how much better the house looks than most of its neighbours, thus whoever reported it was obviously acting out of small-time jealousy.
It looks much better than before when it looked a pale grey colour. Now it's cheerful and bright, and what a petty nightmare neighbour he must have.
The council ought to now paint every home the same hue to match it. It is, after all, the most pleasant one there.
There's nothing worse than a petty, nosey neighbour to make you feel like a prisoner in your own home.
Are there not more efficient methods for councils to spend their funds? The situation is beginning to resemble a dictatorship once more, and communism is spreading faster than ever.
While every other property is worn down and mouldy, why is this one problematic just because it has a different paint job?
No comments:
Post a Comment