PediatricDigest

PediatricDigest

Saturday, 2 March 2024

Thinking about God may encourage risk taking

Fernando Kaskais posted: " Man prays in a Catholic church in Brooklyn, New York.Robert Nickelsberg / Getty Images Here's how belief in a higher power can act like a psychological safety net. By Jim Davies Most God-fearing Americans feel the Almighty has got their back: So"
Read on blog or Reader
Site logo image WebInvestigator.KK.org - by F. Kaskais Read on blog or Reader

Thinking about God may encourage risk taking

Fernando Kaskais

March 2

Wooden pews in a church provide a traditional seating option for parishioners.
Man prays in a Catholic church in Brooklyn, New York.Robert Nickelsberg / Getty Images

Here's how belief in a higher power can act like a psychological safety net.

By Jim Davies

Most God-fearing Americans feel the Almighty has got their back: Some 97 percent of those who believe in the God of the Bible say God has protected them at some point. So how does believing one has a buffer against harm affect a person's approach to risk? Do believers take more risks, thinking God will ultimately save them from bad outcomes, or do they take fewer, fearing God would want them to feel the effects of risky decisions?

York University psychologist Cindel White and colleagues at the University of British Columbia ran a survey study to find out. "We wanted to know whether thinking about God affected taking risks in their personal life," White told me. "So we created a very simple experiment where we manipulated whether people were actually thinking about God when they were considering whether or not to perform a risk in their social life, their career, or a recreational setting."

Thinking about God made believers slightly more willing to take future risks.

For their survey, White and colleagues recruited 631 American Christians and asked them to write about some risk that they considered taking. Later, they asked these same participants how willing they would be to take this risk over the course of the next three months. To try to tease out the influence of their beliefs about God, they broke them into two groups: The experimental group was told "Before you answer these questions, please think about God's influence over what happens in your life. Think about your likelihood of engaging in this risky activity or behavior, after considering God's influence over your life."

The control group was merely told to "think about your likelihood of engaging in this risky activity or behavior." The idea was that by priming the idea of God, any influence their beliefs about God might have on their decision-making would be emphasized, at the forefront of their mind. It turns out thinking about God made believers slightly more willing to take future risks.

Previous work aimed at sussing out the impact of God beliefs on risk taking had produced inconsistent results. According to White, this is because the prior studies were not using a deep enough method of priming. "The general idea of priming is you're activating some concept in the participant's mind. This can take many different forms," she says. "In some studies this is very implicit and seemingly unconscious, where an idea or image is presented outside of their obvious awareness."

In other words, in an effort not to clue participants into the purpose of the study and influence the outcome, some researchers try to use methods that hide from participants the fact that they are being primed. For example, they might be asked to unscramble words, and in the experimental condition, half of those words would be related to God and religion. This is called "implicit priming," and results in a shallow priming that does not sufficiently activate the kinds of beliefs about religion that might affect decisions, according to White.

The risk of using explicit priming, of course, is that the participants might catch on to what the experimenters are doing, which can skew results, because people will tend to behave in a way they believe the experimenters want them to (this is called "demand characteristics"). To make sure this effect wasn't influencing results, White had the believers attempt to guess the hypothesis of the experiment, and found over 90 percent of the guesses had nothing to do with God or religion.

Should people take more risks? Some studies suggest that the answer is yes. People (and other animals) tend to be irrationally risk averse, preferring safer options to risky ones with a higher expected value. But belief in God, it seems, can provide a psychological safety net.

https://bigthink.com/thinking/thinking-about-god-may-encourage-risk-taking/

F. Kaskais Web Guru
F. Kaskais Web Guru
Comment
Like
You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

WebInvestigator.KK.org - by F. Kaskais © 2024. Manage your email settings or unsubscribe.

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app

Subscribe, bookmark, and get real-time notifications - all from one app!

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at March 02, 2024
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

She Wrote the Book on Behavior Change. She's Our Keynote.

Here is what we have planned for CMF 2026 in Atlanta this October.  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ...

  • PowKids Clean Protein: Raising Powerful Kids!
    Photo courtesy of PowKids! I received samples of Powkids protein ($79.98 valu...
  • Latest from Food Politics: Weekend reading: Flagstaff anti-hunger efforts
    In September 2025, I was invited by the Flagstaff Family Food Center to give a talk on “Anti-Hunger Politics 2025: Planting Seeds for Resi...
  • Does Lauren Boebert have her GOP primary locked up — or will a lesser-known candidate break out?
    Money. Incumbency. Near-universal name recognition.U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert [cq ...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

PodiatryDigest
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • June 2026 (30)
  • May 2026 (31)
  • April 2026 (31)
  • March 2026 (31)
  • February 2026 (29)
  • January 2026 (29)
  • December 2025 (32)
  • November 2025 (29)
  • October 2025 (33)
  • September 2025 (33)
  • August 2025 (36)
  • July 2025 (40)
  • June 2025 (24)
  • May 2025 (17)
  • April 2025 (16)
  • March 2025 (16)
  • February 2025 (11)
  • January 2025 (6)
  • December 2024 (8)
  • November 2024 (8)
  • October 2024 (8)
  • September 2024 (1481)
  • August 2024 (1712)
  • July 2024 (2057)
  • June 2024 (2105)
  • May 2024 (2319)
  • April 2024 (2069)
  • March 2024 (2286)
  • February 2024 (2422)
  • January 2024 (2539)
  • December 2023 (1955)
  • November 2023 (1449)
  • October 2023 (1186)
  • September 2023 (1072)
  • August 2023 (826)
  • July 2023 (771)
  • June 2023 (793)
  • May 2023 (829)
  • April 2023 (707)
  • March 2023 (753)
  • February 2023 (673)
  • January 2023 (752)
  • December 2022 (706)
  • November 2022 (731)
  • October 2022 (701)
  • September 2022 (694)
  • August 2022 (716)
  • July 2022 (752)
  • June 2022 (845)
  • May 2022 (1011)
  • April 2022 (1138)
  • March 2022 (596)
  • February 2022 (423)
  • January 2022 (449)
  • December 2021 (581)
  • November 2021 (1495)
  • October 2021 (1539)
  • September 2021 (1455)
  • August 2021 (196)
Powered by Blogger.