PediatricDigest: Latest from Food Politics: FDA revokes 52 food standards of identity: good, bad, or indifferent? and more...

By Marion Nestle

July 30 2025

FDA revokes 52 food standards of identity: good, bad, or indifferent?

The FDA announced that it is revoking 52 obsolete standards of identity for food products. It said it is doing this as part of the Trump Administration’s deregulatory agenda.

“I’m eliminating outdated food regulations that no longer serve the interests of American families,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “Today marks a crucial step in my drive to cut through bureaucratic red tape, increase transparency and remove regulations that have outlived their purpose.”

Two readers, Sharon Sass and Ashley Schuering, wrote to ask me to comment on this move.

For starters, the purpose of the Standards of Identity for Food (SOI) is to ensure that a product contains what is expected. The SOI states what a food must contain, what is optional, and, sometimes. the amount or proportion of ingredient, and the method of production or formulation.

Current SOIs are at 21 C.F.R. Chapter 1, Subchapter B, Parts 131-169.

The easiest example is infant formula. The SOI states the amounts of each nutrient that must or can be in the formula. Infants depend entirely on those nutrients. The SOI makes sense. The FDA is not touching it at the moment.

It is more difficult to make sense of the SOI for fruit preserves and jams. One of the rules reads like this:

Any combination of apple and one, two, three, or four of such fruits in which the weight of each is not less than one-fifth and the weight of apple is not more than one-half of the weight of the combination; except that the weight of pineapple may be not less than one-tenth of the weight of the combination.

The SOI also specifies the use of these ingredients:

(1) Nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners.

(2) Spice.

(3) Acidifying agents.

(4) Pectin, in a quantity which reasonably compensates for deficiency, if any, of the natural pectin content of the fruit ingredient.

(5) Buffering agents.

(6) Preservatives.

(7) Antifoaming agents, except those derived from animal fat.

This, it seems to me, could use some updating.

A law firm, Morrison Foerster, has a succinct summary of the relevant regulatory history.

FDA recognized the need to modernize its SOIs dating back to 1995. In 2005, FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) published a proposed rule in an effort to initiate the process of modernizing SOIs. Then, in 2018, as part of the agency’s Nutrition Innovation Strategy, FDA sought to restart its efforts to modernize its aging SOIs. At a public meeting the following year, stakeholders expressed broad support for FDA’s and USDA’s efforts to finalize the 2005 proposed rule and called for a reopening of the comment period for the 2005 proposed rule to collect information on manufacturing, food technology, market trends, and nutrition science. FDA and USDA ultimately reopened the comment period in 2020. Based on the comments received, the agencies withdrew the 2005 proposed rule to “reconsider how best to approach general principles and food standards modernization

Here is the List of Standards Affected by FDA’s First Set of Food Standard Revocation Rulemakings

Comment

I don’t think this makes any difference. The revocations will give food companies more flexibility in what they put into the listed products, but they will have to disclose the contents of their products on the food label. Even if they remove real ingredients and substitute additives, they will have to say what is in the products. The moral: read food labels!

The FDA’s Actions

A direct final rule revoking standards for 11 types of canned fruits and vegetables that are no longer sold in U.S. grocery stores, including seven standards for fruits artificially sweetened with saccharin or sodium saccharin (and a companion proposed rule in case it needs to adjust this).
A proposed rule to revoke standards for 18 types of dairy products.
A proposed rule to revoke standards for 23 types of food products.

__________

Forthcoming November 11, 2025: What To Eat Now

What to Eat Now: The Indispensable Guide to Good Food, How to Find It, and Why It Matters.

The post FDA revokes 52 food standards of identity: good, bad, or indifferent? appeared first on Food Politics by Marion Nestle

Weekend reading: The collapse of the FDA—a National Tragedy

Weekend reading: The USDA’s latest report on food assistance

The USDA’s Economic Research Service (what’s left of it) has released its annual report on food assistance, which cost $142 billion in 2024 for all of the 16 programs.

This is a decrease from the $168 billion spent in 2023.

Food assistance accounts for two-thirds of USDA’s budget.

SNAP accounts for 70% of USDA’s food assistance budget. Its 14% (inflation-adjusted) decline from 2023 “was larger than for any other year on record.” And that’s before this year’s proposed cuts.

SNAP participation and costs track closely with poverty and food insecurity; when they go up, SNAP goes up.